Неожиданность от учёных: ИИ-инструменты вовсе не всегда ускоряют работу программистов! Исследование показало, что опытные кодировщики теряют время, используя AI-помощников. Как так? 🤔
Пока новички выигрывают от подсказок, профи чаще отвлекаются на исправление ошибок ИИ 💻 или ручной контроль его предложений.
Вывод: AI пока не замена сеньорам, а скорее костыль для джунов. Исследователи намекают — возможно, инструменты просто не адаптированы под сложные задачи.
Задумались? 🤯 Проверьте, ускоряет ли вас GitHub Copilot или ChatGPT! Или… замедляет? ⚠️
Источник: Reuters (но фишку перепроверить стоит!).
178358084 story AI Slows Down Some Experienced Software Developers, Study Finds (reuters.com) 14 Posted by BeauHD on Saturday July 12, 2025 @09:00AM from the contrary-to-popular-belief dept. An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: Contrary to popular belief, using cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools slowed down experienced software developers when they were working in codebases familiar to them , rather than supercharging their work, a new study found. AI research nonprofit METR conducted the in-depth study on a group of seasoned developers earlier this year while they used Cursor, a popular AI coding assistant, to help them complete tasks in open-source projects they were familiar with. Before the study, the open-source developers believed using AI would speed them up, estimating it would decrease task completion time by 24%. Even after completing the tasks with AI, the developers believed that they had decreased task times by 20%. But the study found that using AI did the opposite: it increased task completion time by 19%. The study’s lead authors, Joel Becker and Nate Rush, said they were shocked by the results: prior to the study, Rush had written down that he expected «a 2x speed up, somewhat obviously.» […] The slowdown stemmed from developers needing to spend time going over and correcting what the AI models suggested. «When we watched the videos, we found that the AIs made some suggestions about their work, and the suggestions were often directionally correct, but not exactly what’s needed,» Becker said. The authors cautioned that they do not expect the slowdown to apply in other scenarios, such as for junior engineers or engineers working in codebases they aren’t familiar with. Still, the majority of the study’s participants, as well as the study’s authors, continue to use Cursor today. The authors believe it is because AI makes the development experience easier, and in turn, more pleasant, akin to editing an essay instead of staring at a blank page. «Developers have goals other than completing the task as soon as possible,» Becker said. «So they’re going with this less effortful route.» ← You may like to read: → Please Don’t Cut Funds For Space Traffic Control, Industry Begs Congress DOGE To Rewrite SSA Codebase In ‘Months’ Stanford Research Reveals 9.5% of Software Engineers ‘Do Virtually Nothing’ DARPA Wants to Automatically Transpile C Code Into Rust — Using AI ‘New Junior Developers Can’t Actually Code’ At Amazon, Some Coders Say Their Jobs Have Begun To Resemble Warehouse Work Submission: AI Slows Down Some Experienced Software Developers, Study Finds This is the most recent story. Help us pick the next by voting on submissions , or submit your own .
